How we score pet food

Every product gets a 0–100 composite score combining three ingredient measurements (protein quality, top-5 deck cleanliness, controversy severity), then layered with regulatory and brand-trust signals (AAFCO compliance, FDA recalls, WSAVA-aligned manufacturing). When data is incomplete, we shrink scores toward the category prior so premium-no-GA products can't dominate without evidence.

The composite

quality = 0.50 × protein_subscore + 0.30 × deck_subscore + 0.20 × controversy_subscore

Position weights

Each ingredient slot is weighted by w(i) = 0.85^i — roughly [1.00, 0.85, 0.72, 0.61, 0.52, 0.44, 0.38, 0.32] for the first eight slots. Smooth exponential decay; no cliff at position 5.

Protein subscore (50%)

A 60/40 blend of protein quality and protein density. Tiers: named whole (chicken, salmon) = 10, named meal (chicken meal) = 8, named by-product = 4, unnamed meal = 2, unnamed by-product = 1. Quality normalizes against the observed protein slots — saturates trivially. Density normalizes against an absolute anchor of four named-whole proteins in the top four slots — much harder to saturate, rewards genuine high-meat formulations.

Deck subscore (30%)

Cleanliness of the top 5 ingredient slots. Filler grains (corn, corn gluten meal, wheat, soy, brewers rice) and protein stretchers (pea protein, pea fiber, potato protein, tapioca starch) are penalized; whole-food carbs (sweet potato, brown rice, oatmeal) are not.

Controversy subscore (20%)

Severity- and position-weighted. High-severity flags (BHA, BHT, ethoxyquin, propylene glycol, carrageenan, artificial colors, menadione, animal digest) cost 25 points; medium 10; low 3. Position decides loudness: pos 1 multiplies 3.0×, pos 2-5 multiplies 2.0×, pos 6-10 stays 1.0×, pos 11-20 decays to 0.7×, pos 21+ to 0.4×.

Post-composition

Treats and chews

Single-ingredient chews and many treats have no animal protein in the deck — the standard composite would collapse. For non-food categories with no detected protein, we reweight to 0.60 × deck + 0.40 × controversy and apply a junk-density penalty for refined sugars, refined fats, and refined-flour bases in the top 5 (sucrose, dextrose, palm oil, hydrogenated oil, wheat flour, etc.).

Data sources

Brand-direct scrapers — Hill's Pet Nutrition (Science Diet + Prescription Diet), Royal Canin US, Open Farm, Wellness Pet Food, Tiki Cat, Weruva, Stella & Chewy's, Spot & Tango, Sundays For Dogs, The Farmer's Dog, and Ollie are each pulled from the manufacturer's own product pages.

Aggregators & community data — PetSmart (broad US catalog, ~110 brands, prices and GTINs); Open Pet Food Facts (community CC-BY-SA database, filtered to US-relevant brands); Dog Food Advisor (public guaranteed-analysis numbers only — we do not use DFA's editorial ratings).

Regulatory & research — FDA Pet Food Recalls (official RSS, refreshed daily); AAFCO Official Publication (nutrient profiles and ingredient definitions); WSAVA Global Nutrition Toolkit (criteria for vet-recommended manufacturers); PubMed (peer-reviewed citations on controversial-ingredient flags).

No payment, no placement

We do not accept payment for placement or rankings. The algorithm has no knob for sponsorship. Revenue comes from Amazon Associates affiliate links on outbound buy buttons; the tag has zero effect on the score.